[Commons-Law] Grokster quits file-sharing fight
Lawrence Liang
lawrence at altlawforum.org
Tue Nov 8 20:11:46 IST 2005
File-sharing group Grokster shuts its service as part of a landmark
settlement with the entertainment industry.
< http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/technology/4416484.stm >
Grokster quits file-sharing fight
Grokster website
Grokster has vowed to return with a legal downloading service
File-sharing group Grokster has agreed to halt distributing its software to
settle a long-running copyright case launched by the entertainment industry.
Under the deal, Grokster is permanently banned from taking part in the
spread of copyrighted music and movie files.
It agreed to stop activity that leads to copyright infringement, as well as
paying $50m (£28.7m) in damages.
Grokster's decision has been seen as a victory for the entertainment
industry's fight against online piracy.
Grokster's website was changed on Monday and now says its existing
peer-to-peer (P2P) service was illegal.
"The United States Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that using this
service to trade copyrighted material is illegal," a statement on its
website said.
This settlement brings to a close an incredibly significant chapter in the
story of digital music
Mitch Bainwol, Recording Industry Association of America
"Copying copyrighted motion picture and music files using unauthorised
peer-to-peer services is illegal and is prosecuted by copyright owners," it
added.
Piracy charges
The decision comes four months after a US Supreme Court ruling that
file-sharing services can be held liable for actions of their users.
In June, justices ruled that the entertainment industry could file piracy
lawsuits against technology companies caught encouraging customers to steal
music and films over the internet.
"This settlement brings to a close an incredibly significant chapter in the
story of digital music," Mitch Bainwol, head of the Recording Industry
Association of America, said in a statement.
"This is a chapter that ends on a high note for the recording industry, the
tech community and music fans and consumers everywhere."
Brand survival
However the settlement, submitted at a Los Angeles court, will not mean an
end to illegal file-sharing using Grokster software.
Grokster users will still be able to copy music, movies and software
directly from each others' hard drives, as the decentralised nature of most
peer-to-peer software makes it impossible to control once it is released on
the internet.
And the sharing of copyrighted material shows few signs of slowing down. An
average of 9.2 million users were logged on to peer-to-peer networks in
October, up from 6.3 million a year ago, according to online analysts
BigChampagne.
Its co-defendant in the long-running case - Streamcast Networks - has also
vowed to continue fighting the lawsuit launched by major US record
companies, film studios and music publishers.
The Grokster brand is expected to survive. A statement on its site says it
"hopes to have a safe and legal service available soon".
Reports suggest the group is in the process of being sold to legal
downloading site Mashboxx, and a legal fee-charging Grokster service could
be available within 60 days.
Mashboxx, which signed a licensing deal with music giant Sony BMG in June,
is partly headed by former Grokster president Wayne Rosso.
More information about the commons-law
mailing list