[Commons-Law] Net cos helping banned drug sales guilty: SC
Neela Badami
neelabadami at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 20:08:40 IST 2007
Not strictly related, but the analogy struck me:
http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage_c.php?leftnm=10&autono=306541
On Dec 5, 2007 7:40 AM, Prashant Iyengar <prashantiyengar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mahesh,
> You're right. The error is apparent to anyone who'd care to read the
> judgment.. which is why I try to forward texts along with news. Business
> Standard and The Hindu of course have their own ways of interpreting news in
> misleading ways in their headings. :)
> Regards,
> Prashant
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 6:01 PM, Mahesh T. Pai <paivakil at yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> > I hope it is not just me.
> >
> > On going through the judgment, I feel that there is no justification
> > for use of the term "Net cos" in the subject line.
> >
> > Findings of the investigating agencies that the accused are actually
> > owners of the delinquent sites.
> >
> > The argument was something like this:-
> >
> > accused: m'lord, we are only intermediaries; we have no knowledge of
> > what is being hosted on the sites.
> >
> > Court: No; according to the investigating agencies, you are the owners
> > and you have entrusted ISP's to host the sites on your behalf;
> > you are the people responsible for the contents.
> >
> > In other words, the court held that the accused are not an ISP (Net
> > cos as used in the subject line); there is nothing in the judgment to
> > warrant a conclusion that ISPs and web service providers are liable
> > for criminal activities of their clients.
> >
> > Also, remember that this case is arising from bail applications moved
> > by the accused pending investigation. Trial has not commenced and the
> > court has made it clear that the observations may be revisited at the
> > trial. (see the final para).
> >
> > Prashant Iyengar said on Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:37:15AM +0530,:
> >
> >
> > > The Supreme Court today said an Internet service provider could be
> > > held guilty under the narcotics control law if its network was used
> > > to distribute banned drugs in the country and abroad. The network
> > > providers could not be
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mahesh T. Pai <<>> http://paivakil.blogspot.com/
> > Learn from the mistakes of others.
> > You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself.
> > _______________________________________________
> > commons-law mailing list
> > commons-law at sarai.net
> > https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/commons-law
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> commons-law mailing list
> commons-law at sarai.net
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/commons-law
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/commons-law/attachments/20071205/ce145b87/attachment-0001.html
More information about the commons-law
mailing list