[Commons-Law] Shekhar Kapur on IP and Piracy
Lawrence Liang
lawrence at altlawforum.org
Wed Apr 9 09:38:40 IST 2008
Came across some interesting references to IP and piracy from the film
industry, and was delighted to see Shekhar kapur's response from his
blog which is vastly different fomr Aamir Khan and Yash Copra and Co.
http://www.screenindia.com/news/Piracy-is-Bollywoods-greatest-concern/284830/
http://www.shekharkapur.com/blog/archives/2006/11/intellectual_pr.htm
Intellectual Property and Piracy
I have been both attending and speaking on conferences on the future of
Media and Technology. I use the two terms together as more and more
Technlogy and Entertainment/Media are converging to become the same
bussiness. One thing that consistantly comes up is the question of
Intellectual property and Piracy. I think the lawyers/Corporations have
got it completely wrong...
Intellectual Property (IP) is not and cannot be either constant or
extreme. If it were, then in the modern world there would be no chance
of sharing of ideas, of scientific discovery, even of propogation of
faith. Imagine if the Bible, the Koran or The Mahabharatha were
protected by IP ? Imagine if the teachings of Buddha were protected by
an IP just because one of his disciples actually wrote them down as he
spoke.
Imagine if Einstein's equations were patented or protected from use
wthout financial considerations. Where would scientific discovery be ?
One of the problems with scientific discovery these days, especially in
the field of medicine, such as a cure for Aids, is that groups or
individuals are terrified by the idea of sharing discoveries in case
they cannot protect their financial interests.
I am not denying that people must be rewarded for their effort, and not
inconsiderable expense. But when the whole scientific and medical
communities are motivated by one just goal, the creation of products
that are so well protected that they can extract huge profit for a huge
amount of time, it all becomes a bit ghoulish.
But let me get back to my own field. Media and Entertainment. We are
more and more moving int a digital and an instantaneous world. Where the
commercial life of a product may be huge but for shorter and shorter
periods of time. For example a Video on youtube when it works ut its
revenue models. A popular video in the future may get a billion
downloads in a couple of days and make a billion dollars.
In that scenario, how long would the video maker ask for protection of
intellectual property ? One week maybe ? And then allow the video to be
downloaded free, so that he/she gets a huge following for the next
video. I know this is an extreme example, but then it is good to look at
extreme examples to understand the nature of the problem.
Corporations scream about Piracy. The big music corporations went
ballistic and got Napster shut down. Only to realize that Napster showed
them the way to revive their flagging music sales through single song
downloads. Napster was the origins of the Ipod and Itunes.
Microsoft complain about Piracy in India and China and calculate the
loss of revenue in billions fo dollars. Knowing full well that none of
the people who bought pirated copies of the software would have ever
been able to afford buy the software at it's official retail price. But
in using their (even pirated) software, they are becoming users of
hardware and software, and are entering the consumer market. Surely that
must be good for growth of Microsoft.
At a meeting at the World Economic Forum, one gentleman was complaining
that he was being ripped of in India. he had paid huge sums of money for
the rights to the brand of Tommy Hillifiger in India, and now people
were just making T shirts and printing the Tommy Hillifiger logo and
selling them on the street side at a fraction of his cost. He wanted
them arrested and put into jail for Piracy.
Hey ! Ever consider what extra intrinsic value you are providing the
consumer by printing a brand name on the T shirt ? Till u do that, there
will always be piracy. For the pirate is probaby a small trader looking
for an oppertunity to make some money to look after his family.
Shekhar
More information about the commons-law
mailing list