[Reader-list] Media romanticizing rapists

nisha - mirzachhotoo at yahoo.co.in
Fri Jun 25 19:58:03 IST 2004

Dear Shuddha,
I agree that hanging this rapist is not going to bring his victim back to life or could do anything to erase the pain and trauma that child must have gone through when he was abusing her and raping her. I also agree with you that death penalty is a violation of the right to life, it is inhuman, it is cruel, it is degrading and worse there's no opportunity for the criminal (if a criminal. Death penalty, as you and I know is also a measure to silence dissenting voices) to either repent or reform.
Having said this, I would like to clarify that the purpose of my mail is not to create a debate on whether a rapist should be given death sentence or not or if there should be death penalty at all. The purpose is to bring up the issue of romanticization of the rapists and their portrayal as 'poor man, it was just one time error, he had no control, he is a victim too, look, how good he has been during his sentence period'.  I am against this sort of individualization of sexual crimes against women and children. And it is not just India media that glorifies, directly or indirectly, the criminal. This trend can be noticed in other countries as well. 
I am raising questions about the way violence against women and children is portrayed in media and about media's attitude towards perpetrators (too mild a term in comparison to what these people do) of violence.

Shuddha <shuddha at sarai.net> wrote:
Dear Nisha

This is a brief response to your post about the report in the Kolkata 
edition of the Times of India about the death sentence and impending 
execution by handing of Dhanajoy Chatterjee who raped and murdered a 14 
year old girl.

Let me clarify one thing at the very begining. I have absolutely no 
sympathy for any man who has raped and murdered anyone, and least of all 
someone who has raped and murdered a minor.And I agree with your 
revulsion at any attempt to romanticize the life of any such person, 
just as I would be critical of any attempt to romanticize the life of 
military personnel, prison staff, policemen, terrorists, powerful and 
well connected individuals who operate within and outside the law and 
others who rape and murder, routinely. in the line of their work, and in 
the pursuit of their pleasures.

However, I have absolutely no qualms in saying and believing that the 
death penalty is a barbarous and deeply violent institution that in my 
opinion should only be a matter of shame in any civilized society. The 
fact that the death penalty continues to exist in India, and is 
routinely used, not only against rapists and murderers but also against 
others, is a shocking indictment in my opinion of the routine, 
institutionalized violence that we are prepared to condone in our 
society. Dhananjay Chatterjee's death by hanging, within the confines of 
a state institution, in Alipore Central Jail, will not bring the girl he 
raped and murdered back to life. A life for a life is the ethic of the 
blood feud that we continue to enshrine in our constitution, i think it 
only brings the taint of killing on us all.

I doubt that the death penalty is an effective deterrent against violent 
crime, if anything, societies that retain the death penalty (the United 
States and China being leaders in this field, are arguably much more 
violent than those that have abolished it, after all, the death penalty 
confers on the act of killing a certain legitimacy, and this, in my 
opinion contributes to more, not less violence in society)

I have for many years believed that there needs to be a considered and 
an honest debate about the existence of the death penalty, and 
extra-judicial executions, and concomitantly about the romantic cult of 
violence that is so much a part of the vocabulary of resistance 
movements in India. I am not a pacifist, but I would call for a 
disbanding of military and police functions, I do not believe that 
violence has any virtues, I do not believe that any valuable social or 
political transformations can be brought about by violent means and at 
the same time I am not an absolutist believer in what is called 
'non-violence' (in that I do believe that armed resistance, by 
individuals, or by groups, in self defence is justified, when no other 
options are left, and when survival is at stake) but I do believe that 
the death penalty and thinking that killing people is a solution of any 
kind, is the kind of attitude that actually engenders and fosters 
violence in society.

Dhananjay Chatterjee is responsible for the life he took, and he 
deserves the harshest punishment for it, but we are all responsible for 
the taking of his life, and by ensuring his death we are also cutting 
off the possibility that he would be condemned to live out a life 
contemplating the enormity of the violence that he unleashed on a 
defenceless person. We ensure that neither Dhananjay, nor we, have to 
really think about what violence means.

I look forward to more thinking on the list about this issue.



>reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>Critiques & Collaborations
>To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
>List archive: 

Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/attachments/20040625/2f6360de/attachment.html 

More information about the reader-list mailing list