[Reader-list] Poor migrants face gross exploitation when they send money home

[Rana Dasgupta]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1449026,00.html

The global remittance rip-off

Poor migrants face gross exploitation when they send money home, as a 
new report and website show. Nick Cater reports

Thursday March 31, 2005

Rip-offs by banks and money transfer firms are costing consumers up to 
40% of the cash they send abroad, while transactions can take up to 10 
days, according to a survey published today by the UK Department for 
International Development (DFID).

Sending Money Home - Remittances to Developing Countries from the UK is 
a significant new piece of work on an often-overlooked source of 
development funding for poor countries, the multibillion dollar flow 
from migrant workers and diaspora communities.

Article continues
The DFID has set up a new website, sendmoneyhome.org, with details of 
the main remittance firms and information about fees, exchange rates, 
security and risks to help people transferring cash to relatives or 
friends in developing countries to find the best deals.

Despite scarce data on a phenomenon far more scrutinised in the Americas 
than Europe, the report estimates the annual remittances flow from the 
UK in 2001 to have been around £2.3bn, 0.24% of Britain's gross domestic 
product, equivalent to 78% of the UK's overseas aid budget.

The World Bank conservatively estimates the 2003 global remittances 
figure at $93bn (£49bn) a year, around twice the level of worldwide 
official development assistance, and second only to foreign direct 
investment in terms of financial flows to the developing world.

Some US sources suggest that many informal and unmonitored transfer 
systems - including those also used by terrorists and criminals - mean 
the real figure could be $120bn.

For millions of poor families, remittances constitute up to half their 
income, which they spend on better housing, diet and on consumer goods 
as well as investing in businesses, education and health care. Such 
funds are also a big source of foreign exchange for many developing 
countries.

The DFID study compared around 18 firms, such as money transfer services 
and banks, sending typically small remittance amounts, of £100 or £500, 
to Bangladesh, China, Ghana, India, Kenya and Nigeria, which are, along 
with the Caribbean countries, the main destinations for remittances from 
the UK.

The cost of sending £100 varied from £2.50 to £40, 2.5%-40% of the sum, 
while fees for transferring £500 ranged from £4 to £40, 0.8%-8%, thus 
penalising people only able to afford to send small amounts. Transfer 
times using different systems varied from 10 minutes to 10 days.

America is the largest source of remittances. Researchers involved in US 
efforts to cut transfer costs suggest charges average 12.5%, suggesting 
at least $12bn a year is extracted from mainly low-wage migrants sending 
already taxed income to their families overseas.

The World Bank's Global Development Finance Report 2004 says transfer 
system fees need not be so high, since bank-to-bank "Swift" transactions 
cost around eight pence. The DFID report urges companies to cut charges 
for small amounts, to expand outlets and to improve services.

Yet the DFID falls short of recommending other options, such as capping 
company transfer fees, setting reduction targets, proposing a timetable 
for companies to create cheaper joint systems and distribution networks 
or even tax breaks for remittances that support DFID's aid aims.