[Reader-list] The Attack on Taslima Nasrin in Hyderabad
kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 12 18:28:12 IST 2007
"It appears that if there is one thing that religious fundamentalists, communal, nationalist, secular and leftist politicians agree on is the necessity to curb the freedom of expression in Inda."
How do you categorise yourself Shuddha? Which grouping do you belong to? Your answer would be very interesting.
What you might want to consider is that there is no such animal as "unbridled freedom". The foundations of "free" organised societies are "regulated freedoms". Freedom without any curbs on expression or action are "animalistic".
I should correct myself; even in the non-human domains whether by genetic imprinting or instinct or some primordial intelligence, creatures at most time define the limits of "freedom" they allow each other within the species they belong to. Even the inter-species cosmos exists with it's own checks and balances.
The subject to dwell upon would be whether the "freedoms" are allowed with a bias favouring some and prejudicial to others. That is not being discussed here.
Shuddha, if instead of an Indian citizen you see yourself as a Netizen please be aware that in the cyber space domain also you have only as much freedom as will be "allowed" to you whether by those who run the "servers" or those who arrange the Bits and Bytes.
You also wrote:
"If the self appointed representatives of the Kashmiri Pandit community and their allies pour venom on Sanjay Kak on this list and elsewhere....."
Who does your voice represent Shuddha? Are you the "self appointed" voice of reason while others are "venom" pourers? I see a lot of "venom" in your own words.
Equating Kashmiri Pandits speaking (speech) against Sanjay Kak's docu with the assault (action) by MIM activists does not make a good comparative analogy. If you think otherwise then why should you exclude acceptance that the writings of Taslima Nasreen (speech) are equated with assault (action) by some.
It might help you understand things better Shuddha if you discussed with the Kashmiri Pandit "voices" what exactly is their beef about Sanjay Kak's docu, instead of just dismissing them as part of "bigotry and cussedness"
Shuddhabrata Sengupta <shuddha at sarai.net> wrote:
Dear All (apologies for cross posting on Kafila.org and the Sarai Reader
The recent attack on Taslima Nasreen has again shown how fragile the
freedom of expression is in India today. It breaks whenever a
sentimental reader or viewer has their 'sentiments challenged'. Are all
these worthy gentlemen who go about obstructing screenings and readings
suffering from some early childhood trauma that makes it difficult for
them to countenance growing up and acquiring the ability to listen to
contrary point of view? How long are we to be held hostage to their
What is worse is the fact that the people who attacked her, and have
made public threats to kill her - activists and elected representatives
belonging to MIM, a leftover of the Nizam's hated Razakars, were
arrested and then let off on bail. So, the message that the state sends
out to these goons is - "threaten to kill, be taken to a police station
to have a cup of tea, have your picture taken, be splashed in the media,
go home and make some more threats"
see - http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=90746
In fact, according to a report in the Indian Express today, it is Ms.
Nasreen who is now being booked under section 153 - the same section of
the penal code that was earlier used to detain the unfortunate art
student in Baroda who had offended 'Hindu and Christian sentiments'. So
as far as the Police in the state of Andhra Pradesh is concerned, person
who makes a public threat to kill a writer - a prominent politician is
innocent, and the writer herself, who has never threatened to kill
anyone, nor has asked others to kill people is guilty of inciting
hatred. Both are to be treated equally. There can be no greater travesty
of justice than this incident, and it once again demonstrates how
willing state power in India is to dance in tandem with bigots. It
happens in BJP ruled Gujarat, it happens in Congress ruled Andhra
Pradesh. It happens (see below)in Left Front ruled West Bengal.
Once again this demonstrates that bigotry and cussedness is not the
monopoly of the self appointed representatives of any one community or
political tendency. If the self appointed representatives of the
Kashmiri Pandit community and their allies pour venom on Sanjay Kak on
this list and elsewhere, they are matched in their ardour by the
viciousness of those who have appointed themselves the guardians of
Islam in Hyderabad, and the protectors of Hindu and Christian dignity in
Baroda. And lest we forget, (we do have short memories) let us remember
that the last time Tasleema Nasrin was vilified and hounded and her
publication banned in an Indian state, it just happenned to be in West
Bengal, where she has her largest readership, and this happenned because
the secular progressive left front regime, led by the Contractors Party
of India (Monopolist) deemed her a threat to the sanitized cultural
landscape that they so vigorously uphold and maintain in that state.
The CPI(M)'s party organ 'People's Democracy' found it necessary to
publish the official 'party line' on the ban in its issue dated November
7, 2003 (Vol XXVII, No 49). It said (apologies for this lengthy quotation)
"THE Bengal Left Front government has decided to ban Bangladeshi author
Taslima Nasreenâs latest book, Dwikhandita (âSplit in Twoâ) because it
was feared that the book would incite communal violence. At no point of
time has the book been proscribed on political or literary grounds.
In a government notification issued on November 28, the state LF
government has formally invoked the ban under section 95 of the code of
Criminal Procedure, read with Act 153 of the Indian Penal Code (where it
is considered a criminal and punishable act to create enmity, rivalry,
and hatred amongst religious communities.
State secretary of the CPI (M), Anil Biswas said that there was
apprehension expressed widely that the book would spark off communal
tension, and that very many experts in the field supported this view.
The LF government has banned the book for the sake of the upkeep of
democracy in Bengal. Several newspapers, too, have expressed similar
feelings. Biswas pointed out that âfrom the time the Left Front has been
office in Bengal not a single book or publication has been proscribed on
political grounds.â However, said Biswas, it was a different matter
altogether if a publication or a book incited terrorism and communalism.
Chief minister of Bengal, Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee whose department
issued the notification banning the book, said that he had himself read
the book âseveral times over.â that he has âpersuaded at least 25 noted
specialists to go through the book criticallyâ and that they have
recommended the book to be not fit for circulation among the reading
public. In particular, the pages 49-50 of the book contain very
derogatory and provocative references that go against the grain of the
tenets of Islam and of Islamic beliefs.
Several noted authors including the poet Sunil Gangopadhyay, the
novelists, Dibyendu Palit, Nabanita Deb Sen, and Syed Mustafa Siraj, the
Bangladeshi novelist, Sams-ul Huq, the singer Suman Chatterjee, as well
as the Trinamul Congress leader and Kolkata mayor, Subrata Mukherjee,
among others, have come openly out against the book and have supported
the decision by the state LF government to get the book banned.
Pradesh Congress leader Somen Mitra who has called Taslima Nasreen a
blot on the world of women, has described the book as having no
difference with a piece of pornography and has said that nobody ought to
assume rights to hurt the sentiments of a religious community.
The book which forms a part of Nasreenâs multi-volume autobiography has
been charged by the reading public of Kolkata and Bengal with obscenity
and has come under fire for its maligning and falsified personal
references to the lives of several noted scholars of Bengal and
Bangladesh as well.
However, the book, as Anil Biswas made clear while speaking to the media
in Kolkata recently, was banned because of the fact that portions of the
book would cause religious disharmony to break out, with the religious
fundamentalists utilising the book to fan the flame of communal fire.
True to form, the BJP chief Tathagata Roy has supported Taslima
Nasreenâs derogatory references to Islam and has opposed the
proscription of the book. Mamata Banerjee has chosen to hold her
silence, as she is wont to do of late on very many other matters as well."
It appears that if there is one thing that religious fundamentalists,
communal, nationalist, secular and leftist politicians agree on is the
necessity to curb the freedom of expression in Inda.
There is only one possible ethical response to this pathetic display of
arrogance by the self appointed representatives of Hindu, Muslim,
Christian and Communist sentiment, and that is to ensure the widest
possible circulation of these materials in the public domain. It is to
organize as many screenings as possible of a film like 'Jashn-e-Azaadi'
(or any other film that is attacked in a similar fashion) and to hold
public readings and distributions of the books of someone like Taslima
In 'Homeless Everywhere:Writing in Exile' an essay by Taslima Nasreen
that had been first published in English in Sarai Reader 04: Turbuluence
She wrote -
"Just like in West Bengal today, my books have been banned earlier in
Bangladesh on the excuse that they may incite riots. The communal
tension raging through South Asia is not caused by my books but by other
reasons. The torture of Bangladeshâs minorities, the killing of Muslims
in Gujarat, the oppression of Biharis in Assam, the attacks against
Christians, and the Shia-Sunni conflicts in Pakistan have all occurred
without any contribution from me. Even if I am an insignificant writer,
I write for humanity, I write with all my heart that every human being
is equal, and there must be no discrimination on the basis of gender,
colour, or religion. Everyone has the right to live. Riots donât break
out because of what I write. But I am the one who is punished for what I
write. Fires rage in my home. I am the one who has to suffer exile. I am
the one who is homeless everywhere."
If we want to ensure that writers, filmmakers and artists are not
'homeless everywhere' then we have to ensure that they receive the
hospitality that enables the conditions that allow their work, thought
and expression to continue to have a public life. This means making sure
that their work lives and continues to breathe in society, by any means
For those who are interested, and can read Bangla, some of Taslima
Nasrin's work is available in the form of downloadable pdfs from
www.talimanasrin.com. When the venerable Buddhadev Bhattacharya decided,
after consulting twenty five eminent intellectuals to ban her book, I
decided to download the said book, make twenty six photocopies of the
entire book bind them and distribute them free.
That is one method to deal with censorship (formal or informal) I am
sure that there are other, more creative methods out there as well. I
would welcome practical suggestions from those in the community of the
people who are reading this post
about how these attacks on the freedom of expression may be confronted
and made irrelevant. Let us try and make some time for peaceful film
watching and reading.
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
More information about the reader-list