[Reader-list] Arundhati Roy talks on 'War of People'
babuubab at gmail.com
Fri Jun 4 17:35:41 IST 2010
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <indopakpeacemarch at yahoo.co.uk>
Arundhati Roy talks on 'War of People'
Activist Arundhati Roy spoke on 'War of People' at the Mumbai Marathi
Patrakar Sanghin in Mumbai on Wednesday. Below is the transcript of the
"I think we should reverse the way we see this issue (war against Naxalism)
and the way it is being put to us. But the fact is nobody needs this war
more than this government. The fact is it is manufacturing an enemy to
justify its war. When the PM said Maoists are the greatest internal threat
to the country for the first time in 2004, what was the situation?
Maoists were just wiped out in Andhra, but why did the share prices of the
mining companies go up? Because it was a message to them saying their
interests were taken care of. The government actually made the Maoists seem
bigger than they were...
What is that makes it so urgent for the government to fight this war? In
2005, a huge number of MoUs were signed by the biggest corporations in the
world, and they have been waiting. If you read the business papers you will
understand clearly which MNC is waiting for which land.
Maoists are only the violent end of a spectrum of a dissent in this country
that this massive sale of land is just not on. Whether it is Kalinganagar,
or POSCO, or Singur, or the Maoist movement, at the heart is land
All these infrastructure projects, the first thing they do is relocate the
I am not here to defend the killing of innocent people by anybody, not by
the Communist Party of India-Marxist, the Maoists or the government. That is
not my brief. When the 76 CRPF personnel were killed, there was this
tremendous pressure on me, saying you went inside, you romanticised
violence, now come and condemn this violence. BUt I ask what were the CRPF
people - she lists an array of heavy arms -- doing there?
It is not so simple, it is a very thorny, knotty issue. It is not possible
for me to go there and see these people with their loin clothes, bows and
arrows, and you want to snatch it from them, and you want me on your side,
it cant be done, she says
This is the war between the poorest people of the world, against the biggest
democracy in the world. And they are winning. They have stopped the
corporates on their tracks.
They are asking a serious question. This is questioning the meaning of
democracy, of civilisation itself.
These are not questions that are coming from art galleries -- they are
coming from the millions of people who have put their lives on the line to
ask this question. The answers are the key to what is going to become of
this planet, this civilisation, the human race.
When Capitalism won against the Afghans in the 1980s, the whole world did a
somersault, including India [ Images ]. We became natural allies of the US
and Israel, and then digressed to condemn the attack on the flotilla.
When i wrote 'Walking with the Comrades', I was happy when I was criticised
of romanticising because I believed in the romance of the forests, the
romance of the people. We love romance... we like the romanticism of
violence in our movies, as long an airhead with biceps and machine gun is
doing it. But, when the violence of the poor people is romanticised, we
don't like it.
In the Dandakaranya, where I walked with the comrades, 640 villages were
emptied. Many of them live in Andhra, many live in the forests.
The same things -- same violence, same terror, same allignment of forces --
happened during the Telangana [ Images ] movement of the 50s and 60s.
Pakistan, which was never allowed to have a democracy thanks to the US, is
craving for a democracy, while India, a democracy is fighting for a military
The media, the middle class is begging for a military state, she says.
When a journalist asked her if she supported violence, she said, "In human
nature, there is always violence, and there is always love. When we decide
to be violent and when we decide to love is up to the individual.
Today people like me are totally on the side of the resistance; because we
think the question the tribals are asking -- whether the bauxite can be left
in the mountains -- is correct.
The adivasis are not fighting for state capitalism, they are fighting for
the bauxite to be left in the mountains. They are saying we don't want
advanced weapons, aircraft, etc. Mining bauxite gives alumina, which
consumes a lot of water. They have a revolutionary armed resistance but they
do not have a revolutionary vision.
It has a totalitarian vision, it does not tolerate dissent. I cannot quarrel
with that military strategy right now but then we have to think what is
going to happen. So that is why a dialogue is needed
A rock hard resistance, which is elastic and takes in dissent and argument,
will make it stronger. But we need to understand we can't betray the causes
we are fighting for.
All across South Asia, what are the areas under attack? All of them are
under assault by a marauding capitalist system. In Afghanistan, the
resistance is taking the form of radical Islam; in India, it is communist
extremism -- but the assaulting force is capitalist everywhere."
You must talk about these issues because your life will be affected too at
the end of it."
Roy then takes questions from the audience.
A questioner says he shared every emotion expressed today, but what can we
do until human nature changes?
Roy: We shouldn't conclude that human nature is greedy. IT is also sensible.
The most successful secessionist movement in this country is the secession
of the middle and upper class in this country. They are sitting there and
saying 'What is our bauxite doing in their mountains, what is our water
doing in their rivers, they ask from up there'.
A questioner, who introduces himself as a student of Indian economics, says
India is the most oppressive society and a revolution is required, but the
Maoists are not the revolutionaries who are needed right now. He says it was
wrong of Roy to support them.
Roy: What is going in the Congress is an old game, where Sonia and Rahul are
playing the good guys, and Chidambaram and Manmohan are the bad guys. Rahul
Gandhi goes to Dantewada, but doesn't say a word about Salwa Judum (an
uprising of local indigenous people in Chhattisgarh to fight Naxalites),
which was run by a Congress leader and supported by the BJP government.
Source: Rediff News
More information about the reader-list