[Urbanstudy] Fwd: global warming is a scam

[anila emmanuel]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: anila emmanuel <anilaemmanuel at gmail.com>
Date: Nov 23, 2007 7:53 PM
Subject: Fwd: global warming is a scam


 *Global Warming is a Scam*

*By John Coleman   (jcoleman at kusi.com ) *

*

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly
offended by it. Global Warming... it is a SCAM.

Some misquided scientists with environmental and political motives
manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990's to create an
illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same
environmental-extremism type jumped into the circle to support and broaden
the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming
claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way
to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with
movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this
wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental
consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

Now their ridicules manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become
a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the
Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed
but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at
ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15
minutes documentary segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of
either party.

However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism
or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you "believe in." It
is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long
expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured
crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won't believe me, a
mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award
winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

I suspect you might like to say to me, "John, look the research that
supports the case for global warming was done by research scientists; people
with Ph.D's in Meteorology. They are employed by major universities and
important research institutions. Their work has been reviewed by other
scientists with Ph.D's. They have to know a lot more about it than you do.
Come on, John, get with it. The experts say our pollution has created an
strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a rapid, out of control global
warming is underway that will sky rocket temperatures, destroy agriculture,
melt the ice caps, flood the coastlines and end life as we know it. How can
you dissent from this crisis? You must be a bit nutty.

Allow me, please, to explain how I think this all came about. Our
universities have become somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There is a
culture and attitudes and values and pressures on campus that are very
different. I know this group well. My father was a  Ph.D-University types. I
was raised in the university culture. Any person who spends a decade at a
university obtaining a Ph.D in Meteorology and become a research scientist,
more likely than not, becomes a part of that single minded culture. They all
look askance at the rest of us, certain of their superiority. They respect
government and disrespect business, particularly big business. They are
environmentalists above all else.

And, there is something else. These scientists know that if they do research
and the results are in no way alarming, their research will gather dust on
the shelf and their research careers will languish. But if they do research
that sounds alarms, they will become well known and respected and receive
scholarly awards and, very importantly, more research dollars will come
flooding their way.    *

*Remember the United Nations had formed the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) in the late 1980's with the mission of accessing and
countering manmade climate change.  The UN had established this global
bureaucracy on climate change.  It had become the "world series" or
"olympics" for Climatologists and Meteorologists and scientists in related
fields.  You had to strive to be accepted, invited to present and review
papers and travel to international meetings of the committee.  Otherwise you
were a nobody in your field. *

*So when these researchers did climate change studies in the late 90's they
were eager to produce findings that would be important and be widely noticed
and trigger more research funding. It was easy for them to manipulate the
data to come up with the results they wanted to make headlines and at the
same time drive their environmental agendas. Then their like-minded
Ph.Dcolleagues reviewed their work and hastened to endorse it without
question.
**

There were a few who didn't fit the mold. They did ask questions and raised
objections. They did research with contradictory results. The environmental
elitists berated them and brushed their studies aside.

I have learned since the Ice Age is coming scare in the 1970's to always be
a skeptic about research. In the case of global warming, I didn't accept
media accounts. Instead I read dozens of the scientific papers. I have
talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I
know I am correct when I assure you there is no run away climate change. The
impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril.
It is all a scam, the result of bad science.

I am not alone in this assessment. There are hundreds of other
meteorologists, many of them Ph.D's, who are as certain as I am that this
global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.

I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct
silliness and rude dismal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global
Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the
temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm
pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have
been duped.

The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as
much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway.

I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a
cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.*







from the desk of
*anil laul
*c.e.o & principal architect
*anangpur** building centre
*(the ABC of holistic human settlement design)
faridabad, haryana - 121003 (india)
*telefax*: +91-129-2512364
*mobile*: +91-98100-59691
*email*: anillaul at vsnl.com, anillaul at rediffmail.com
*URL*: http://www.anangpur.com

Yahoo ID: laulanil
Skype ID: anil.laul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/urbanstudygroup/attachments/20071204/05ae4f5e/attachment-0003.html